Yazar "Menendi, Umman" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    The Effect of the Application of Adductor and Infiltration of Local Anesthetic Between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (IPACK) Block to Patients on Postoperative Recovery and Sleep Quality Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Randomized, Controlled Study
    (2024) Et, Tayfun; Korkusuz, Muhammet; Menendi, Umman
    Aim: The adductor canal block (ACB) and IPACK (Infiltration of local anesthetic between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee) block are motor protective blocks that provide effective analgesia and allow early ambulation. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect on postoperative recovery and sleep quality of patients applied with ACB and IPACK for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Material and Method: This prospective, double-blinded, randomized, controlled study included 80 patients who underwent unilateral TKA under spinal anesthesia. The patients were separated as those applied with ACB+IPACK (Group ACB+IPACK, n=40) and a control group (Group C, n=40). The primary outcome was the postoperative first-day quality of recovery scale (QoR-15). Secondary outcomes were postoperative first and second-day Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) test and range of motion (ROM), the total amount of rescue opioid drugs required, pain scales at different time points in the first 48 hours postoperatively, sleep evaluation on the postoperative and 6 following nights, and evaluation of sleep quality for 1 month using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Results: The QoR on postoperative days 1 and 7 were better in the ACB+ IPACK group than in the control group (p= 0.001, p= 0.002, respectively). On postoperative days 1 and 2, the TUG (p= 0.035, p= 0.019, respectively) and ROM (p=0.003, p=0.000) values were higher in the ACB+ IPCAK group. Postoperative opioid consumption was lower in the ACB+IPACK group (p= 0.012). The PSQI values at 1 month postoperatively were similar in both groups (p =0.095). Conclusion: The study results demonstrated that ACB+IPACK applied with ultrasound for TKA postoperative analgesia provided effective analgesia, higher QoR and physical performance, and reduced postoperative opioid consumption. However, there was no effect on postoperative sleep quality.
  • Küçük Resim
    Öğe
    The effect of the application of adductor canal block (ACB) and Infiltration of local anesthetic between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) block to patients on postoperative recovery and sleep quality following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled study
    (Selcuk University, 31 October 2024) Et, Tayfun; Korkusuz, Muhammet; Menendi, Umman
    The adductor canal block (ACB) and IPACK (Infiltration of local anesthetic between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee) block are motor protective blocks that provide effective analgesia and allow early ambulation. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect on postoperative recovery and sleep quality of patients applied with ACB and IPACK for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Material and Method: This prospective, double-blinded, randomized, controlled study included 80 patients who underwent unilateral TKA under spinal anesthesia. The patients were separated as those applied with ACB+IPACK (Group ACB+IPACK, n=40) and a control group (Group C, n=40). The primary outcome was the postoperative first-day quality of recovery scale (QoR-15). Secondary outcomes were postoperative first and second-day Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) test and range of motion (ROM), the total amount of rescue opioid drugs required, pain scales at different time points in the first 48 hours postoperatively, sleep evaluation on the postoperative and 6 following nights, and evaluation of sleep quality for 1 month using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Results: The QoR on postoperative days 1 and 7 were better in the ACB+ IPACK group than in the control group (p= 0.001, p= 0.002, respectively). On postoperative days 1 and 2, the TUG (p= 0.035, p= 0.019, respectively) and ROM (p=0.003, p=0.000) values were higher in the ACB+ IPCAK group. Postoperative opioid consumption was lower in the ACB+IPACK group (p= 0.012). The PSQI values at 1 month postoperatively were similar in both groups (p =0.095). Conclusion: The study results demonstrated that ACB+IPACK applied with ultrasound for TKA postoperative analgesia provided effective analgesia, higher QoR and physical performance, and reduced postoperative opioid consumption. However, there was no effect on postoperative sleep quality.
  • Küçük Resim
    Öğe
    The effect on the incidence of rebound pain of the application of anterior suprascapular nerve block added to interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder surgery: A randomized controlled study
    (2024) Et, Tayfun; Korkusuz, Muhammed; Yarımoğlu, Rafet; Menendi, Umman
    This study aimed to compare the incidence of rebound pain applied with anterior suprascapular nerve block (ASSB) added to interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) as postoperative analgesia in shoulder surgery. This prospective, observer-blinded, randomized study involved 60 patients who were to undergo shoulder surgery. The patients were divided into two groups: group ISB (n=30) received ISB block, while group ISB+ASSB (n=30) received ASSB in addition to ISB. The primary outcome was to determine the occurrence of rebound pain. Secondary outcomes were numerical rating scale (NRS) values of postoperative pain at 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 24, and 48 hours, 48-hour opioid consumption, sleep scale for the postoperative night and subsequent 6 nights, and the quality of recovery (QoR) scale evaluated on postoperative days 1 and 7. No statistically significant difference was found between the ISB group (56.7%) and the ISB+ASSB group (40%) in the incidence of rebound pain following the resolution of peripheral nerve block (PNB) (p=0.196). The ISB+ASSB group had a significantly longer time to PNB wear off (14.77±2.07 ) compared to the ISB group (12.87±1.94) (p=0.001). The postoperative day 1 QoR-15 values were significantly better in the ISB+ASSB group (122.60±10.79) than in the ISB group (116.33±11.48) (p=0.031). Sleep evaluation on the postoperative night showed a significant difference between the groups; ISB+ASSB (3[2-3])–ISB (2[1-3]). The addition of ASSB to ISB did not have a sufficient effect with respect to the incidence of postoperative rebound pain following shoulder surgery. However, there was seen to be a positive effect on prolonging the PNB and on the QoR day 1 values.